Dr Lee chides PM Lee for being “mischievous and dishonest” after his latest statement on 38 Oxley Road

8769

Dr Lee Wei Ling, the second child of Lee Kuan Yew has alleged in her Facebook that her older brother was being “mischievous and dishonest to selectively use quotes” from her and out of context to suggest that her younger brother and his wife were trying to cheat her out of their father’s final will.

“In fact, Lee Kuan Yew’s final will was very important to me as it gave me a clear right to live in the original house at 38 Oxley Road which I very much wanted,” she said.

She claimed that she had repeatedly made clear to her elder brother and his wife that there was no duplicity by her younger brother and his wife.

Dr Lee chided her elder brother, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, for continuing to repeat a position that she had both clarified and discredited as a smokescreen. She said the smokescreen was meant to obscure a key point – that Lee Kuan Yew’s his final will of 17 December 2013 is in the same terms as his will of 19 August 2011. The final will included the demolition clause.

“Exactly as our father had intended,” she emphasised.

Dr Lee claimed that after Mr Lee made the will on 19 Aug 2011, her elder brother and his wife, Ho Ching, became unhappy that it gave her the right to live in the house, and pushed her father on the matter.

“This eventually resulted in 2012 in my losing my right to stay in the house and my share of my father’s estate being reduced to only a life interest,” she added.

Dr Lee said that she was very upset when she found out about it, and quarrelled with her father. She credited the wife of her younger brother for interceding with her father on the matter.

“It was in fact my sister-in-law, Suet Fern, who interceded with my father (when Ho Ching and Hsien Loong were overseas) on my behalf. She met with Lee Kuan Yew and made a case that since I was his only daughter and was unmarried, it was particularly important that he provide for me rather than reduce my interest in his estate. My father did reinstate me and gave me an extra 1/7 share as a result. Hsien Yang and his wife were never informed of this extra share and continued to worry that I should be fairly treated and have a right to live in the house.” – Dr Lee Wei Ling

Dr Lee said that she was concerned about her right to continue to live at 38 Oxley Road and that her father’s will of 17 December 2013 gave her that right.

“It is this that Ho Ching and Hsien Loong are trying to deny me,” she insisted.

DISHONEST ALLEGATIONS OF CHEATING Hsien Loong and Ho Ching are being mischievious and dishonest to selectively use…

Posted by Lee Wei Ling on Thursday, 15 June 2017

Mr Lee Hsien Yang had earlier released the demolition clause in the final will and pointed out that Lee Kuan yew had initialed right beneath the clause.

LHL's statutory declaration (now public). "there is no evidence that Mr Lee even knew that the Demolition Clause had…

Posted by Lee Hsien Yang on Thursday, 15 June 2017

He further said that the Prime Minister’s statement to Parliament contradicts the statutory declaration he made to his secret committee.

“It is wrong to lie to Parliament and it is wrong to lie under oath,” Mr Lee asserted.

Stamford Law attended to the attestation of the Will at Lee Kuan Yew's explicit request. Hsien Loong raised no legal…

Posted by Lee Hsien Yang on Thursday, 15 June 2017

PM Lee had earlier claimed that he had “serious questions” about Lee Kuan Yew’s final will.

PM Lee claims that he had “serious questions” about Lee Kuan Yew’s Will

27 COMMENTS

  1. The younger Mr Lee and Ms Lee are the executors of Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s will. They said in the statement that PM Lee was removed as executor in 2011. Beware.
    The joint statement also said that the younger Mr Lee was leaving Singapore “for the foreseeable future” and “against his desires” because there was a fear that organs of state would be used against him, his wife Mrs Lee Suet Fern, and Ms Lee. Beware?
    Lord Pannick has advised that he disagrees with the AG’s advice, and that section 22 Presidential Elections (Amendment) Act 6 of 2017 as it stands is unconstitutional. Beware?
    From unlikely to find someone that can challenge Tan Cheng Bock, to Tan Cheng Bock cannot even be a candidate. Beware?
    From Wee Kim Wee is simply and clearly not an Elected President, period.
    To bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, … Wee Kim Wee … Elected President. Beware?
    We question whether able leaders with independent political legitimacy will be sidelined to ensure Hsien Loong’s grip on power remains unchallenged.
    We see many upright leaders of quality and integrity throughout the public service, but they are constrained by Hsien Loong’s misuse of power at the very top.
    Explaining why Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam is not PM?
    If PM can misuse his official power to abuse his siblings who can fight back, what else can he do to ordinary citizens.
    Do Dr Lee Wei Ling and Mr Lee Hsien Yang look like ‘someone you can easily abuse’?

  2. With the bulk of estate each have inherited,it is more than enough to live out their days comfortably.Man wears his birthday suit to this world and leaves with the same.Trying to pick holes in each other’s word is not wise.Every story has three sides-my side,your side and the true side.Who is right and who is wrong,let heaven do its part.If I m one of LKY’s sons,I would be very contented.