The guts to impose Halimah as an iconic Muslim President

1602

It sure took a lot of courage and guts to swim against the currents to appoint a Muslim woman as the presidency in Singapore, and that is exactly what the Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had when he pressed on with his party’s agenda.

Yet, the entire game plan could have damaged the PAP’s support at grassroots level, with the ire of the larger community made clear through the chatter in coffee shops and certainly on social media platforms.

But then again, the PAP is like a Phoenix, rising always from its bruises only to impress and to march on with its political agenda in this tiny, but very powerful Island Republic.

For Mr. Lee, the imposition of Mrs. Halimah Yacob at the iconic post of President of the Republic was not as dramatic as the recent fratricidal war that tore his family apart and rummaged through the legacy of Mr. Lee Kuan Yew, the first Prime Minister and the founder of modern Singapore.

A quick review of the social media platforms in Singapore shows an almost total backlash from the majority community against the PAP, while the war of the siblings attracted the antipathy of a larger segment of the Singaporean populace.

More Muslims, Indians and a large number of the Chinese community were bashing the Lee’s for their washing of the dirty family linen in public, but the entire episode collapsed after PM Lee addressed the nation through the Parliament.

That changed the entire landscape and PM Lee earned the respect of across the globe for his bravado.

But attacking the PAP on a so-called-democratic principle was perhaps the wrong move by its opponents, considering the fact that the party had won one of the biggest electoral victory in its history in 2015.

True though that the opposition, unable to win the necessary seats and votes in the last general elections, wanted to use the Presidential election as a platform to press the PAP into an ugly corner.

But its rejection of the ‘race’ factor and the need to have a rotational system to elect or choose a particular community to become the powerless President was probably not the right move.

History will tell that the election – or rather non-election – of Mrs. Halimah as the first woman president of Singapore was not well received by a large number of the community in Singapore.

Will the agitators accept responsibility for the racial divide that became prominent through the social media platforms?

The live coverage of the installation of Halimah to the post of President was met with the ‘angry face’ icon from mostly non-Malays, sparking outrage from the Singaporean Malay community in particular.

It also showed the deep communal and racial divide in the Singaporean nation over the political decisions made from the top.

While it is evident that the PM’s party, the People’s Action Party, has so far enjoyed unilateral rule without major glitches since the country’s independence, it is more difficult today for the leadership to force its policies on the nation.

But will the ‘nomination’ of the first woman president become the pore that could cause a loss of support for the PAP in the future?

A muted protest by anti-Halimah-anti-PE17-walkover antagonists failed to impress, with only a few joining the opponents.

This showed the divide between the real and the surreal in Singapore. Does it mean what happens on the internet and the social media does not necessarily translate into reality for Singapore?

Perhaps there might be a slight depression in the support for the PAP in a future election but that would not mean the party risks losing its grip on power.

Would it have been easier for the PAP to engage all the stakeholders, that is the opposition and the communal leaders in pushing for its agenda to have a Malay-Muslim as President?

Nevertheless, the installation of the first Malay-woman President in the country received the accolades of almost the entire Asean region, hailing it as a progressive move while the foreign nations did not bother about the way it happened.

If they were to gauge the PAP’s strength, it is the party’s and its leadership success in imposing its choice and in barring its opponents from competing in the ‘election’ that shines.

But it is PM Lee’s personal handling of the situation, pushing forward his agenda to have a Muslim, a Woman and a controversial one for that matter (with many questioning whether she is Malay or Indian), as Singapore’s iconic President.

This commentary was first published on the WFTV portal. The content of this article does not reflect the opinion of TISG.

Get the latest news, opinions and commentaries. Available on Android  

40 comments

  1. Peter Ong says:

    The definition of Malay is nothing new! It was defined when the GRC concept to look after the minority was crafted into the constitution. The same definition of what constitutes a Malay was being used in the EP! Why nobody complain when the GRC was implemented?

  2. Peter Ong says:

    She was elected by NATURAL SELECTION because there were many other eligible malays who failed or refused to show up! Is it her fault? NO!!!

    She won according to the rules FAIRLY and SQUARELY!!

    #HALIMAHISMYPRESIDENT

  3. India is stupified by the sudden change in race as they had written in their papers that she was the first Indian speaker of parliament in Singapore. Now they are told that she is actually a malay according to the government.

  4. She will go down in Singapore history as the most dislike President. The non-elected President pretending that she has the mandate of the people. The biggest joke in our 52 year history.

  5. What sort of commentary is this? Reading through it, it sounds more like a pro PAP cum anti opposition write up, rather than an independent unbiased one. A waste of time.

  6. On 6 FEB 2017 Chan Chun Sing in parliament call Halimah Madam President twice
    All of you can google Search at YouTube to listen and see with your own eyes!
    Only the truth will set us free !
    So sad that we are rob of the rights to vote for our President

  7. Sas Karma says:

    Now I wonder if Singapore pools, Turf clubs- government own legal gambling dens will put her face in their betting offices? What i know is haram for muslims to be even gambling..but not so for the modern ones… somehow a pic of a person wearing tudong in betting outlets???…mmmMMMmm…!

    1. Sas Karma says:

      SiButa Dari Goa Hantu Sibuta, you are really mata butah kar? what kind of Quran have you been studying? As a non-muslim, I grow up learning what Muslims can do and cant do. Do you mean its also ok for muslims to be even gambling? and worst still a picture of woman in TUDUNG in a Betting outlets. You are such a stupid laughing stock! betol bodoh! please read your Koran again and again!
      https://www.al-islam.org/greater-sins-volume-1-ayatullah-sayyid-abdul-husayn-dastghaib-shirazi/fourteenth-greater-sin

    2. Sas Karma…what im try to say that your stupidity very glaring. Whats wrong with picture of a person wearing tudong in betting outlets? It shows that u know nothing abt Islam and being a Muslim all abt.

    3. Sas Karma says:

      Sibuta is in a state of denial or is very naive, like as if he prefer not to look up at the walls of government offices where president faces are planted.

  8. Ah Soh says:

    Correct! Even India who congratulated her when she was appointed First Woman Speaker of the Singapore Parliament, has not done so. Or was the congratulatory letter still under wrap?

    1. They are shock because they so proudly presented her as an Indian speaker of Parliament. Now she suddenly became malay. They are dumbfounded looking up their dictionary to see where it says that an Indian muslim is now a malay.

Comments are closed.