WP refuses to give up, files motion on Elected Presidency yet again


Refusing to give up after being blocked from raising an adjournment motion regarding the upcoming Presidential election at the last Parliamentary sitting, on 11 Sept, the Workers’ Party (WP) has re-filed the motion for the next parliamentary session to be held on 2 Oct.

The WP does not seem to think it’s too late to debate the adjournment motion titled “Counting from President Wee Kim Wee or President Ong Teng Cheong – policy decision or legal question?” even though President Halimah Yacob has since assumed office in the reserved election by means of a walkover.

The WP had previously raised the same adjournment motion for debate on 28 August –  well before the Presidential Election went underway.

The motion was filed to debate parliament’s decision to count from appointed President Wee Kim Wee instead of elected President Ong Teng Cheong, on the recommendation of the Attorney-General’s Chambers, to trigger a reserved election set aside for Malay candidates since there hasn’t been a Malay president for the last 5 consecutive terms.

If the Government had chosen to count from President Ong Teng Cheong, the last election would have been open to all races. Only the election after this would have been a reserved one, under new amendments to the Elected Presidency scheme that were instated this year.

Two competing bids were suddenly filed before the WP could speak on the matter and Members of Parliament (MPs) eventually chose to debate People’s Action Party (PAP) MP Murali Pillai’s “Community Sentencing and Other Rehabilitative Options” over the PE2017 issue. Another ruling party MP, Vikram Nair, had also filed an adjournment motion on “The Future of National Service” that was part of a ballot yesterday:

“For the Parliamentary sitting on 11 Sep, Ms Sylvia Lim had on 28th August filed an adjournment motion “Counting from President Wee Kim Wee or President Ong Teng Cheong for Reserved Presidential Election – Policy Decision or Legal Question”.
“On 30th August Parliament notified MPs that there were two other adjournment motions filed on 29th August, namely “Community Sentencing and Other Rehabilitative Options” by Mr Murali Pillai (Bukit Batok) and “The Future of National Service” by Mr Vikram Nair (Sembawang). MPs were further advised that the adjournment motions filed would be subject to ballot under Standing Order 2(8)(d).
“We wish to inform everyone that at the ballot conducted today, the topic by Mr Murali Pillai was picked. Accordingly, Ms Sylvia Lim would not be able to speak on her adjournment motion on 11th September.”

Although some may question whether the issue of counting Presidential terms is till relevant, netizens responding to the WP’s latest post have largely encouraged them for their decision to refile the motion:

The Party’s motion to debate the issue in Parliament comes after veteran politician Dr Tan Cheng Bock’s failed legal challenge over the same issue. The High Court upheld Parliament’s decision to count from President Wee Kim Wee and said that the decision falls outside the remits of the court.

The presidential hopeful who had intended to contest this year’s election after losing PE2011 by 0.34% of votes appealed the High Court’s decision. A panel of five appellate judges at Singapore’s highest court of law, the Court of Appeal, also threw out his application after initially reserving judgment.

In his first statement after the final rejection of his application, Dr Tan had said:

“Some may say that my court application was a fool’s errand. But I do not see it that way. When MP Sylvia Lim asked the Government in Parliament why they chose to start the count of 5 presidential terms with President Wee Kim Wee (resulting in 2017 being a reserved election year), the Government challenged her to go to Court for an answer. That is wrong and I felt the need to respond. I firmly believe the Government should have answered in Parliament instead of challenging a Parliamentarian to go to Court.”

When Sylvia Lim filed the motion to debate the issue once again last month, the Party said:

“In the wake of intense public discussion after the parliamentary debates and a court case on the reserved presidential election, the Workers’ Party believes it is in the public interest for the Government to clarify this issue surrounding the election of our Head of State.”

The only opposition party elected into Parliament may still receive a chance to debate the topic in the House, if no other last-minute motions are filed again this time.

WP blocked from raising reserved PE2017 issue at next parliamentary sitting

Get the latest news, opinions and commentaries. Available on Android  


  1. Harold Tan says:

    Becoz we dont want this divisive fiasco repeated in future. The plan was ill conceived and hastily created by one party politicians. Need to make sure there is a happy compromise, even hold a referendum so all citizens can have their say. People need to feel proud of their democracy and meritocracy and that is still well and alive. The ruling party needs to wake up.

  2. Aiyoh WP. Don’t waste time on this issue anymore. All wrapped already. Spare your time and energy to prepare for the next GE and Aljunied Town Council court case. If WP and all the other opposition parties are still mulling over this inconsequential EP issue incessantly, forgetting to prepare for the real fight, then comes next GE, you all will be wipe off. The writings are on the wall already. So choose your battles intelligently, the ones that matter.

    1. Read ST page A36 … article entitled “Was Alexander the Great also known as Iskandar Zulkarnain?”
      Seem to be justifying that Malay is more than Malay. At the end of the article, #NotMyPresident mentioned.

  3. Thta’s the Spirit ! If possible sue their pants off. SDP started the ball rolling. If the courts showed bias, and often allow the PAP to of the judgements then it illustrates that one is beholden to the other. Get them on records and when the PAP no longer rule Then that is the time to straighten out things.

  4. Ayoyo!
    For goodness sake, WP is accountable for the $$$ Debits in the Town council !
    Clarify and settle tt big issue first.

    PGs taught me this:
    ” the tortoise shld not laugh at the turtle tt they do not hv a tail”.

    1. …and when private Lee family scrabble arised – go to parliament. Also that balloting result to stop WP from bringing up PE2017 matter. What kind of suka suka rubbish law is this? They are trying very very hard to stop TCB. Mayb there’s anomaly in the reserves.

  5. We are sinking, the ship was torn apart, the PAP regime denounced 70% Chinese were guilty of racism by passing the constitution amendment bill.
    Chinese only vote Chinese they blamed!

    1. Chun Wah Kee sad to say , guess the 60+ %BB residents did not vote for their MP nor was race given a weightage not to, but rather they voted for the white termite gang and other obvious considerations proffered by the white termite gang !!!
      Stockholm syndrome manifesting in the many fellow Singaporean!
      Time is with DrCSJ …it may happen sooner than expected !!! Should that happen, a new dawn would be upon democracy…… the ultimate finale of a Singapore for Singaporean would be brought about with an alternate government in place !!! Oppositions ., work out your best ! 52 years has passed us by , Singapore is still awaiting a new dawn on democracy , return the power to the pple!! Majullah Singapura!!!

  6. WP is right to continue to question the corrupt policies of pap and not resigned to accept them as the majority of the people would otherwise do so. To give in to corrupted policies in silence with a sense of hopelessness is exactly what pap wants to achieve.

  7. Jason Ko says:

    I can already see PAP question their agenda why only after TCB statements did they decide to file a motion and accused of being opportunist. PAP diversion pattern always usual.

  8. WP do not waste your effort and time to debate on something that is done. Accept it and move on. I would prefer WP to bring this up in the next GE as talking on this matter is of no use to neither to your party at this time or to all Singaporean. Frankly speaking everyone respect President Halimah. It is not the way she agreed on but it is the way the government does. So move on and close this.

    1. Facebook Profile photo
      Thomas Cheng ( User Karma: 0 ) says:

      There u go again! We now understand why this govt has free hand in everything they wish to do. It’s people like you that does nothing but just follow. I’m sick n tired!

    2. Facebook Profile photo
      Thomas Tay ( User Karma: 0 ) says:

      hey ignorant idiotic fool roberto antonio you are either a migrant or otherwise try his luck on polishing balls it seems to me that you are an unprincipled and unscrupuluous fool person you will be amoung the very first victim in any calamitous occasion “not everyone or anyone respect this kind of president”so try not to waste your fool hardy mission while with the grace of God Almighty
      has given you good air to breath

      Vote for Patriotism not hoolliganism

    3. you speak for yourself…go down to Hong Lim park n witness the silent protest n hear the remarks n unhappy speeches recorded on that day …
      So our displeasure demonstrated by ordinary Singaporean n inside the parliament by WP …reflects the growing unhappiness of making a mockery of Singaporean…..

  9. André Tan says:

    The constitution will stand long after alimama ends her term, unless someone challenges the status quo. We’ve witnessed a sad part of our history this recent days. Hopefully, we will also witness its renewal …

Comments are closed.